Legal Opinion

Jackson v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 28, 2003No. B159850PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KITCHING, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal presents the issue whether Government Code section 3304, subdivision (d) 1 in the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (§ 3300 et seq., the Bill of Rights Act) establishes the statute of limitations in a charter city’s action to discharge a police officer, or whether, under home rule provisions applicable to charter cities in article XI, section 5 of the California Constitution, the city charter establishes the statute of limitations. We conclude that because section 3304, subdivision (d) addresses a matter of statewide interest,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Baggett v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Jordache Enterprises, Inc. v. BrobeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Pasadena Police Officers Assn. v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Mays v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Breslin v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. County of Los Angeles v. California State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Wences v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Bettencourt v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API