Legal Opinion

AquaSource, Inc. v. Wind Dance Farm, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 6, 2005No. 22A01-0409-CV-396PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellants-Defendants, AquaSource, Inc. and The Reynolds Group, Inc. (collectively, AquaSource), appeal the trial court's grant of partial summary judgment in favor of Appellee-Plaintiff, Wind Dance Farm, Inc. (Wind Dance).

We affirm.

ISSUE

AquaSource raises two issues on appeal, which we consolidate and restate as: whether the trial court erred as a matter of law in finding that AquaSource breached its contract with Wind Dance by failing to make a reasonable and good faith effort to satisfy the condition precedent.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY 1

AquaSource…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hamlin v. StewardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Indiana State Highway Commission v. CurtisIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Fort Wayne Lodge, LLC v. EBH CORP.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Billman v. HenselIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. McGraw v. MarchiolliIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. M West, Inc. v. Oak Park Mall, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
  2. Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Ruse v. BleekeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Crossroads Service Center, Inc. v. ColeyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Cricket Ridge, LLC v. WrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API