Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Davis

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 2007No. 89A05-0602-CV-104PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRONE, Judge.

Case Summary

Cincinnati Insurance Company and Indiana Insurance Company (collectively, “the Insurers”) appeal the trial court’s entry of summary judgment for Dr. T. Brandon Davis (“Davis”), Arbor Neuropsycho-logical Assessment Clinics, Inc. (“Arbor”), and Culligan United States Filter (“Culli-gan”) on the Insurers’ negligence claim. We reverse and remand.

Issues

We restate the issues as follows:

I. Whether we have subject matter jurisdiction to consider the Insurers’ appeal as to Culligan and Davis;

II. Whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for Davis;

III.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jarboe v. Landmark Community Newspapers of Indiana, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Georgos v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Daub v. DaubIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Colen v. Pride Vending ServiceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Harness v. SchmittIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Newland Resources, LLC v. Branham Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Carey v. INDIANA PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Halterman v. Adams County Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Hoesman v. ShefflerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API