Legal Opinion

Indiana State Highway Commission v. Curtis

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1998No. 37S05-9810-CV-557PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

BOEHM, Justice.

This case holds that a settlement agreement that explicitly requires approval by the Indiana Department of Transportation is not enforceable against the State without that approval.

Factual and Procedural Background

In 1985, Carl and Lorraine Sutton 1 granted the State of Indiana an easement onto their commercial property to complete highway drainage work along State Road 10 in Jasper County. In 1988, the Suttons sued the State of Indiana, the Highway Commission 2 and the State’s contractor, Brown, Inc., alleging that the drainage work had destroyed their…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. Van CleaveIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Chidester v. City of HobartIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Hamlin v. StewardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Indianapolis Convention & Visitors Ass'n v. Indianapolis Newspapers, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Barrington Management Co. v. Paul E. Draper Family Ltd.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Georgos v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Rogier v. American Testing & Engineering Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Bagnall v. Town of Beverly ShoresIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. B&R Oil Company, Inc., Empire Petroleum Partners, LLC, and EPP-Atlas Acquisitions, LLC v. William E. Stoler, Kathlyn Stoler, Jeffrey A. Levy, and Con-Serve, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Carnahan v. Moriah Property Owners Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API