Legal Opinion

Anderson v. City of Issaquah

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 24, 1993No. 29148-3-IPublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.

Appellants M. Bruce Anderson, Gary D. LaChance, and M. Bruce Anderson, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Anderson), challenge the denial of their application for a land use certification, arguing, inter alia, that the building design requirements contained in Issaquah Municipal Code (IMC) 16.16.060 are unconstitutionally vague. The Superior Court rejected this constitutional challenge. We reverse and direct that Anderson's land use certification be issued.

The City of Issaquah cross-appeals, contending the trial court erroneously granted summary dismissal of its affirmative defenses. Anderson…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. State v. Reader's Digest Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Streater v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  4. Sidis v. Brodie/Dohrmann, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Barry & Barry, Inc. v. Department of Motor VehiclesWashington Supreme Court · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Silverstreak, Inc. v. STATE DEPT. OF LABORWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Silverstreak, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Hayes v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Cingular Wireless, LLC v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API