Legal Opinion
Arrington v. Colortyme, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 17, 2013No. Civil Action No. 12-264EPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CATHY BISSOON, District Judge.
I. MEMORANDUM
This is a putative class action for the unlawful interception and disclosure of electronic communications pursuant to the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (“ECPA”), 18 U.S.C. § 2511. Plaintiff Leslie Arrington, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, alleges that Defendants ColorTyme Inc. (“ColorTyme”), the franchisor, and CMG Rentals LLC (“CMG”), the franchisee, from whom she obtained a rent-to-own computer, installed and used “spy” software to intercept and monitor her emails and other private activities. (See…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Doe v. HeskethDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Byrd v. Aaron's, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Sam Mannino Enters., LLC v. John W. Stone Oil Distributor, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- HE v. CHINA ZENIX AUTO INTERNATIONAL LIMITEDDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- HEWLETT v. CANNON MILLS COMPANYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.