Legal Opinion
Doe v. Hesketh
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 25, 2014No. Civil Action No. 13-4935PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DALZELL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Jane Doe seeks statutory redress under 18 U.S.C. § 2255 for her victimization in the child-porn trade when she was a minor by suing a putative class of men convicted of- illegally possessing her image, including defendants Dan W. Joa-chim, Mayer Finkelstein and Charles Lin-dauer. These three defendants each pled guilty in their respective Districts to possession of child pornography after which the Department of Justice sent Doe a notice that her image was among those in each defendant’s possession.
Before us now are Joachim, Finkelstein and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Raser Tech. v. Morgan StanleyUtah Supreme Court · 2019
- Buckeye Pennsauken Terminal LLC v. Dominique Trading Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Toussant v. WilliamsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Doe v. HeskethDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- ABIRA MEDICAL LABORATORIES, LLC v. KarimDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.