Legal Opinion

HE v. CHINA ZENIX AUTO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided June 12, 2020No. 2:18-cv-15530Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ZHENGYU HE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Civ. No. 2:18-15530 (KM-JAD) Plaintiff, OPINION v. CHINA ZENIX AUTO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, JIANHUI LAI, and MARTIN CHEUNG, Defendants. MCNULTY, U.S.D.J.: The plaintiffs have filed a putative class action alleging securities fraud against China Zenix Auto International Limited (“China Zenix” or the “Company”) and certain of its senior officials (See 1AC (DE 23)).1 The allegations stem from purportedly false or materially misleading statements and omissions made…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API