Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Gordon

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1959PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBenjamin Brenner, J.

In an action for annulment defendant husband appears specially pursuant to section 237-a of the Civil Practice Act and moves to set aside the service of process made on him pursuant to section 235, or, in the alternative, to strike from the complaint such parts as relate to alimony and counsel fees.

The motion to set aside the service is based on alleged defects in the proof of service and on the ground that neither the plaintiff nor the defendant is a resident of New York and that an action for annulment, therefore, is not maintainable under section 1165-a of the Civil Practice Act.

The proof…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stuyvesant v. . WeilNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Air Conditioning Training Corp. v. PirroteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  3. Raynor v. RaynorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  4. Kelly v. SchrammAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schwartzberg v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1983
  2. Chittenden v. ChittendenNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Scruggs v. International Investments, Ltd.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1973
  4. Dan Curtin Dodge, Inc. v. KingSyracuse City Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API