Legal Opinion
Raynor v. Raynor
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 19, 1951PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The court had jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter, on the motion for a reduction of alimony (Fox v. Fox, 263 N. Y. 68; Civ. Prac. Act, § 1170), and the lack of an authenticating certificate was a defect or irregularity which could be corrected nunc pro tunc. (Cf. Kelly v. Schramm, 197 App. Div. 377; Lawton v. Kiel, 51 Barb. 30; Civ. Prac. Act, § 105.) Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fox v. FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Lawton v. KielNew York Supreme Court · 1868
- Kelly v. SchrammAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
3Cited by8 opinions
- Midfirst Bank v. AghoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Sparaco v. SparacoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Nandy v. Albany Medical Center HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. MartinCivil Court of the City of New York · 2005
- Gordon v. GordonNew York Supreme Court · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.