Legal Opinion

Chittenden v. Chittenden

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1965PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Macken, J.

This action is for a judgment declaring invalid a judgment of a Mexican court divorcing the plaintiff and the defendant Howard E. Chittenden, declaring that the subsequent marriage of the defendants is invalid, and that plaintiff’s marriage to the defendant Howard E. Chittenden is still in full force and effect.

Subsequent to the alleged divorce the defendant Howard E. Chittenden married the defendant Marion Katherine Bagley (Smithwick), (hereafter called Bagley), in Rhode Island. One child has been born to the defendants since their marriage.

The present action was originally commenced against…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Geary v. GearyNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Lambert v. LambertNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Winter v. WinterNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Molyneaux v. SevillaNew York Supreme Court · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Borkowski v. BorkowskiNew York Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Wellington Associates v. Vandee Enterprises Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1973
  3. Dan Curtin Dodge, Inc. v. KingSyracuse City Court · 1966
  4. Sacks v. SacksNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Carr v. CarrNew York Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API