Legal Opinion

Bowler v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 22, 1955No. Civ. 16583PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Petitioner seeks review and the annulment of an award and decision after reconsideration made by respondent Industrial Accident Commission, in which the commission found that petitioner sustained an industrial injury, consisting of a coronary occlusion causing, in addition to temporary total disability, a permanent partial disability of 78 per cent, of which, after apportionment, only 19% per cent is attributable to the injury.

Questions Presented

1. Is the commission’s finding as to the proportion of disability attributable to the industrial injury supported?

2. Does apportionment apply where…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Colonial Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommisionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. G. L. Eastman Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Tanenbaum v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Franklin v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Ferguson v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Heath v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. City of Glendale v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Southern California Edison Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API