Legal Opinion

Spears v. Huddleston

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1973PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is an action on a promissory note to collect an alleged balance of $1,548.71, in which defendants filed a counterclaim to recover the amount of an alleged overpayment of $3,706.56. The note was secured by a chattel mortgage on certain trucks and traders which were later repossessed and sold by plaintiff.

Defendants’ counterclaim alleged that plaintiff repossessed one of the trucks and trailers' on January 11, 1966, but did not sell them until “on or about January of 1969”; that “by reason of said repossession and sale the Plaintiff did not act as required by the terms of the Uniform…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fulton Insurance Co. v. White Motor Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Booth v. MoodyOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Houghton & Palmer v. BeckOregon Supreme Court · 1881
  4. McMillan v. MontgomeryOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Todd v. Occidental Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Myers v. Cessna Aircraft CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. All-States Leasing Co. v. OchsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. Davis v. Tyee Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Richards v. DahlOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. King City Realty, Inc. v. Sunpace Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API