Legal Opinion
Mills v. Jackson
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 17, 1912No. Civ. No. 983PublishedCited by 6 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Siskiyou County, and from an order denying a new trial. James P. Lodge, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was in replevin. It grew out of the purchase by plaintiff of certain real and personal property for the sum of $35,000. At the time of the agreement for the sale a memorandum was drawn up by Mr. Mills and signed by Mr. Jackson, as follows:
“March 8th, 1911, received of Robt. M. Mills $500, being part of the purchase price, for the ranch, known as the Arbaugh Ranch and the Arenburgh Ranch and also the ranch known as the French Ranch in McCloud or Squaw Valley ranch, containing in all 965 acres with all appurtenances, also all personal property on said ranches, live stock, hay and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Firebaugh v. BurbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Howell v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Jackson v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Hedstrom v. Union Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1908
- Habenicht v. LissakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by6 opinions
- Johnson v. SchimpfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Kirkpatrick v. Tapo Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Yellowstone Sheep Co. v. Diamond Dot Live Stock Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1931
- Benom v. BenomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- White v. Citizens National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.