Jackson v. Jackson
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial- The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
In July, 1873, the plaintiff and defendant intermarried at the city of Los Angeles, in this state. In May, 1890, the plaintiff commenced this action to have her marriage with defendant annulled, upon the ground that at the time it was contracted he had another wife living, and that such former marriage had never been dissolved by a decree of divorce or otherwise. The defendant, by his answer, admitted a prior marriage, but alleged that for five successive years immediately preceding his marriage with the plaintiff his former "wife had been absent from him, and was not known by him…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by19 opinions
- In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Coats v. CoatsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Bacon v. SouleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Dimond v. SandersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Taylor v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.