Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Norfolk Southern Corp.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided October 2, 2000No. 3248PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CURETON, Judge:

This appeal arises from claims filed by John David Rogers (Rogers) against his employer Norfolk Southern (Norfolk) under the Federal Employer’s Liability Act (the FELA)1 and against the U.S. Silica Company (U.S. Silica) for common law negligence. Following the trial of this case, the jury returned a verdict of $3,000,000, apportioning thirty percent to Norfolk and seventy percent to U.S. Silica. On appeal, Norfolk argues: 1) Rogers should not recover under the FELA because Norfolk was not negligent; 2) Rogers’s negligence was the sole cause of his injuries; 3) the verdict was…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  3. Steinke v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Richard Gallose v. Long Island Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  5. Raymond D. Robert v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Norfolk Southern Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  2. Rogers v. Norfolk Southern Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API