Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Norfolk Southern Corp.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 22, 2003No. 25720PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice PLEICONES:

We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision in Rogers v. Norfolk Southern Corp., 343 S.C. 52, 538 S.E.2d 664 (Ct.App.2000). We affirm as modified.

FACTS1

Norfolk Southern Corporation (“Norfolk Southern”), under contract with U.S. Silica (“Silica”), transports Silica’s product over spur tracks owned by Silica. Silica runs slurry2 through pipes running beneath the spur lines to a storage facility.

A slurry pipe ruptured two days before John David Rogers’ (“Rogers”) injury. Silica employees temporarily repaired the pipes, intending to replace them at a later…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Steinke v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hancock v. Mid-South Management Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  2. Baggerly v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Peterson v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  4. Whaley v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  5. Montgomery v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API