Legal Opinion

Kennard v. Bernard

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 15, 1904PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City (Dennis, J.)

1Opinion of the Court

Briscoe, J.,.

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The controversy in this case involves the construction of certain. clauses of the last will and testament of Samuel S. Clayton, late of Baltimore City, deceased.

The material facts' as disclosed by the record and upon which the questions to be decided arise, are as follows:

Mr. Clayton died in January, 1896, leaving real and personal estate of large value, located in Maryland and Virginia. A portion of this property he owned jointly with a son, James E. Clayton. By the fourth clause of his will he devised as follows : “As to all the rest and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fulton v. HarmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
  2. Mercer v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  3. Zimmerman v. FraleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  4. Sloan v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
  5. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. SutroCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
  2. Totten v. HarloweCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
  3. Jencks v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  4. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1920
  5. Taylor v. MonmonierCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API