Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Sutro
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court, No. 2, of Baltimore City. * This appeal was taken from a proforma decree of the Court below sustaining the exceptions of the appellee, as purchaser of certain real property in the proceedings mentioned, the ground of the exceptions being that the trustee could not give a good and valid title to the property sold. The case is stated in the.opinion of' the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
The question in this case is a narrow one, and one, too, in regard to which there cannot he, it seems to us, much difficulty. Noah Walker,'the testator, died in 1874, seized and possessed of a large and valuable real and personal property, and leaving but one child, Patrick Henry Walker. After various pecuniary and'specific legacies, the testator devises all his property and'estate of every kind to Samuel H. Caughy and Noah W. Caughy, and the survivors of them, and the heirs, executors and administrators of the survivors, in trust that they should:
1st. Take from the income $10,000 per annum,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Druid Park Heights Co. v. OettingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mercer v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
- Yates v. YatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
- Navarre v. City of Benton HarborMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Brock v. ConkwrightCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Kennard v. BernardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1904
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.