Legal Opinion

Totten v. Harlowe

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 21, 1936No. 6675PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal appellants ask to have set aside a substitution of trustees under a deed of trust executed in October, 1929. Four hundred and ninety notes aggregating $385,000 were made and delivered on the security of the property conveyed in the trust. The original trustees were Luther A. Swartzell and Edmund D. Rheem. Good cause existed why they should be removed and new trustees substituted, and in February, 1931, a suit was instituted by Elizabeth S. Moore for this purpose. In March, 1931, the Supreme Court of the District made a decree in her suit substituting Francis W. Hill, Jr., and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fulton v. HarmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
  2. Boss v. HaganCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1919
  3. Kennard v. BernardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1904
  4. Jencks v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  5. Guarantee Savings, Loan & Investment Co. v. PendletonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schlaefer v. SchlaeferCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. View Crest Garden Apartments, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  3. Milo Manor, Inc. v. WoodardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
  4. Totten v. HarloweCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API