Legal Opinion

Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Ellis

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 6, 1920PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Three appeals in one record from the Baltimore City Court. (Gorter, J.)..

1Opinion of the CourtBriscoe, J.

There are three appeals1, in the record now before us, from the Baltimore City Court, and they involve the validity of the appointment of a substituted trustee by the Circuit Court of Baltimore City under the will of William Wilkens, late of Baltimore County, deceased, and the exercise by this trustee of certain powers conferred by the will upon three trustees named therein, the trusteeship being vacant at the date of the appointment of the sole trustee.

The objections to the exercise of the powers by the sole trustee are-: first, that the will provides for not less than two trustees and,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sells v. DelgadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  2. Mercer v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  3. Gambell v. TrippeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  4. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. SutroCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  5. Hesson v. HessonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Van Roy v. HooverSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  2. In re the Accounting of WalkerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API