Legal Opinion

Commercial Discount Co. v. Town of Plainfield

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 12, 1935PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.

This action was brought against the town of Plainfield by the plaintiff as assignee of Exseo Bellevance, seeking to recover the sum of $2550 which the plaintiff claimed had become due to Bellevance from the town by virtue of a road-building contract existing between them. The facts found by the trial court material to the determination of the questions of law involved in this appeal are as follows: On October 25th, 1932, the State, through its highway commissioner, entered into a written contract with the town of Plainfield, whereby the town undertook to build four certain roads, about five…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. M. J. Daly & Sons, Inc. v. New Haven Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
  2. Pinches v. Swedish Evangelical Lutheran ChurchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887
  3. Pierce, Butler & Pierce Manufacturing Corp. v. EndersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  4. Grand Lodge of Ancient Order of United Workmen v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
  5. King v. MaloneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gaudio v. GaudioConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  2. Jones Destruction, Inc. v. UpjohnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  3. Strimiska v. YatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  4. Thibault v. FrechetteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  5. Blanchard v. VoghelConnecticut Superior Court · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API