Legal Opinion

Blanchard v. Voghel

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided September 21, 1943No. File No. 8745PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff's complaint is in the form of a bill of interpleader under the statute (Gen. Stat. [1930] § 5911) directed against two defendants. It alleges in substance that (1)(2) in May, 1943, plaintiff was the owner of certain real estate and sold it to M; (3) both defendants claim they are entitled to $310 "as commission for effecting the sale"; (4) defendants are "proposing to proceed with law-suits" against plaintiff "to enforce their claims"; (5) plaintiff "is ready and willing" to pay the regular commission "but is ignorant of the rights of the defendants." The complaint concludes with…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Housatonic Valley Insurance Agency, Inc. v. KlipsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  2. Hardy v. ScottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  3. Nash v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1827
  4. Athol Savings Bank v. BennettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  5. Commercial Discount Co. v. Town of PlainfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Crozier v. ZabooriConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  2. Avco Corp. v. Peterson Engineering Co., No. Cv535232 (Nov. 16, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
  3. Northwestern v. Estate, No. Cv98 0164835 (Apr. 10, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
  4. Northwestern v. Estate, No. Cv98 0164835 (Apr. 10, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
  5. Vancortlandt v. CotterPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API