Jackson v. United States Department of Labor
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Co. and several of its employees (collectively Kaiser) appeal a district court order enforcing subpoenas duces tecum issued by the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA). Kaiser argues that MSHA does not have jurisdiction over the Kaiser facility in issue, and that certain documents are privileged. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
Kaiser’s Gramercy Works in Louisiana is a plant that processes bauxite into aluminum oxide, known as alumina. The alumina is sold to other concerns for smelting into aluminum ingots.
On July…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States of America and Revenue Agents Clarence H. Isabel and John S. Reid of the Internal Revenue Service v. The El Paso CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- In Re GlaxoSmithKline PlcSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- In Re: Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Company, July 5, 1999 Explosion at Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Company, Gramercy Works Facility Subpoena Duces Tecum,movantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Doe v. Baylor UniversityDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2017
- Aasha Dennis, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas Johnson and on Behalf of Her Minor Child, D.J. v. Westbank Fishing, LLC, et al.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2026
- Alcoa, Reynolds Metals Company, Ron Warpula and Paul Stanley Danser, Jr. v. Hydrochem Industrial Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.