Legal Opinion

Doe v. Baylor University

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided August 11, 2017No. 6:16-CV-173-RPPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ROBERT PITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Production of Pepper Hamilton Materials, (Dkt. 93); Defendant’s Response, (Dkt. 104); and Plaintiffs’ Reply (Dkt. 106). The Court held a hearing addressing this and other discovery-related motions on June 16, 2017. The parties also submitted follow-up briefing after the hearing that addressed the motion. (Pis.’ Post-Hearing Br., Dkt. 117; Def.’s Resp., Dkt. 123). Based on these filings, the relevant law, the parties’ arguments, and the record in this case, the Court issues the following order.

I.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Freudensprung v. Offshore Technical Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grigson v. Farmers Group, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2019
  2. Luckenbach Texas, Inc. v. SklossDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2023
  3. Maxus Energy CorporationUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2021
  4. McGowan v. Southern Methodist UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2023
  5. The Maxus Liquidating Trust v. YPF S.A.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API