Legal Opinion

Buford v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 4, 1989No. 88-2899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs Indinar and Tony Buford filed this diversity suit in the district court claiming that Indinar suffered long-term effects from exposure to benzene during the course of her employment as a lab technician at defendant Bell Telephone Laboratories’ (BTL), Shadeland, Indiana facility, and that Tony experienced a loss of consortium due to his wife’s illness. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants on the ground that plaintiffs’ common law remedies were preempted by the Indiana Occupational Diseases Act. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.

I

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Pleasant v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Kofron v. Amoco Chemicals Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  4. Evans v. Yankeetown Dock Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Fisher v. Shenandoah General Construction Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Buford v. American Telephone & Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API