Legal Opinion
United States v. Paret-Ruiz
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided May 19, 2009No. 06-2709PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DICLERICO, District Judge.
Following a five-day trial, appellant Jorge Alberto Paret-Ruiz (“Paret-Ruiz”) was found guilty of conspiracy to import with intent to distribute, and to possess with intent to distribute, five or more kilograms of cocaine. He argues that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions, that the district court erred in denying his request for a new trial based on his proffer of newly discovered evidence and his claim that the government suppressed exculpatory evidence in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Royal W. Hadfield, Jr., United States of America v. Helen HadfieldCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Pierre Michel Henri Giry and Steven SewardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Vega-MolinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Rafael Portela, United States of America v. Francisco Villaman-Rodrguez, United States of America v. Juan A. CarrasquilloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
- United States v. Zhen Zhou WuCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- United States v. TroyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- United States v. LunaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Vazquez-CastroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.