Legal Opinion

United States v. Troy

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided September 25, 2009No. 08-2002PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Circuit Judge.

In April 2008, a jury convicted the appellant, David Wong Troy, of assaulting a federal officer in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111(a), which imposes criminal liability on one who “forcibly assaults, resists, opposes, impedes, intimidates, or interferes” with a designated federal officer who is “engaged in ... the performance of official duties.” During the trial, Troy timely moved for a judgment of acquittal, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the relevant federal officer had been engaged in the performance of official duties…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. RamseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. Flores-MontanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. United States v. Perez-RuizCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Piero Heliczer, Jack William Martin, Iii, and Jack v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. Santiago-MendezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. Burgos-MontesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. ValdiviaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. Rivera-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API