Legal Opinion

Gonzales v. Gauna

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1922No. 2553PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

DAVIS, J.

In 1912 Teófila M. Gonzales, appellee, delivered to Celso J. Chavez eight cows under a contract by which he agreed to return 16 cows in five years. The contract concluded with the clause “and the party of the second part [Chavez] gives as responsible Mr. Francisco Gauna of Raton, New Mexico, county of Colfax, bondsman of this agreement.”' Francisco Gauna signed the instrument, the word “fiador” or “surety” preceding his name. Before the expiration of the five-year term, he died, and afterwards Chavez was asked by Mrs. Gonzales that he procure a new surety. He…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Breed v. HillhouseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1829
  2. Shadburne v. DalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Brady v. Equitable Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  4. Ellis v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  5. Sellars v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harp v. GourleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Brush v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
  3. Spray v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Doorly v. GoodmanMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Charles Ilfeld Co. v. NicksonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API