Mele v. Becker
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBurns, J.
In this cause, plaintiff appeals a jury verdict of no cause of action. He claims that he was prejudiced by certain remarks of a presiding judge to a jury panel as part of a general indoctrination on the court system and on the role of the jurors.
The February term jury panel reported to the presiding judge for an indoctrination lecture prior to reporting to any courtroom for jury duty. During the course of the lecture, the judge stated that in civil cases, the good cases are settled and the difficult ones go to trial.
The same day the plaintiff’s case was heard by a jury but before a different…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- The People v. IzzoIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
- The People v. FisherIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- People v. CowanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- People v. TennantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. VanceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. CarrikerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. CosmeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008