Legal Opinion
People v. Tennant
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 29, 1939No. Crim. 1624PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, J., pro tem.
Appellant was convicted on three counts of an indictment, the first and third being for fraudulent appropriation of property by a public officer, and the second, for grand theft. This appeal is taken from the judgment of conviction and order denying a new trial.
Appellant was assessor and secretary of Oakdale Irrigation District. As such secretary, he did much of the actual work of carrying on the business of the district, the directors relying on him and ratifying his acts, deals and negotiations.
About June 15, 1936, appellant had a deal with one Clyde Boothe for the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. CrossanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- People v. CurranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Klombies v. Weeks Poultry Community, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1932
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. HessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- People v. YuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- People v. TheodoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.