Legal Opinion
Dairyland Power Cooperative v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 29, 2007No. 04-106 CPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
DAMICH, Chief Judge.
On January 18, 2007, Plaintiff filed a “Motion to Compel Production of Documents Withheld Under the ‘Deliberative Process’ and Attorney-Client Privileges.” Defendant filed its response on February 28, 2007, and Plaintiff filed a reply on March 19, 2007.
Background
In its motion, Plaintiff asks the Court to compel the production of 281 documents as to which the Government invokes, inter alia, the deliberative process and/or attorney-client and work product privileges. All of these documents were among a larger group of documents similarly at issue in another…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Department of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Confidential Informant 59-05071 v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Dairyland Power Cooperative v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.