(PS) Barnett v. CA DMV
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERTA BARNETT, No. 2:17-cv-01517-TLN-CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 This matter is before the Court on Defendant California Department of Motor Vehicle’s 19 (“Defendant” or “DMV”) Motion to Dismiss.1 (ECF No. 35.) Plaintiff Roberta Barnett 20 (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition (ECF No. 37), and Defendant filed a reply (ECF No. 40). For the 21 reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendant’s motion. 22…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.