Workman Motor Co. v. Pacific Finance Corp.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ELIAS HANSEN, Justice.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover the value of two Durant automobile trucks alleged to have been converted by the defendant. As originally filed, plaintiff’s complaint also contained a second cause of action whereby plaintiff sought an accounting from the defendant. Defendant demurred to the original complaint upon the ground that a cause of action for a conversion could not properly be joined with a cause of action for an accounting. The demurrer was sustained, whereupon plaintiff dismissed, without prejudice, its cause of action for an accounting.
In its answer…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Westminster Investment Co. v. McCurtainUtah Supreme Court · 1911
- Heywood v. Ogden Motor Car Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1928
- Smith v. AlfordUtah Supreme Court · 1906
- Peterson v. BeanUtah Supreme Court · 1900
- Beck v. LeeUtah Supreme Court · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Utah State Building Commission Ex Rel. Mountain States Supply Co. v. Great American Indemnity Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
- Acor v. Salt Lake City School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Starley v. Deseret Foods CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1938