Legal Opinion

Acor v. Salt Lake City School District

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 2011No. 20091014PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice LEE,

opinion of the Court:

T1 This is an interlocutory appeal from a decision granting the Salt Lake City School District's motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff-Appellant Shelly Acor's claim for reimbursement of attorney fees and costs under Utah Code section 52-6-201 (the "Reimbursement Statute"). Acor argues that she is entitled to reimbursement of fees and costs incurred in her successful defense of criminal charges of sexual abuse of a former student. Although Acor was acquitted on all charges, the School District challenges her right to reimbursement based on evidence…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. John R. v. Oakland Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Birkner v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Schurtz v. BMW of North America, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Becerra v. AsherCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  5. Valerius v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bolden v. Doe (In re Adoption of J.S.)Utah Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Peak Alarm Co. v. Salt Lake City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2013
  3. DIRECTV v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Christensen v. Juab Sch. Dist.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Christensen v. Juab Sch DistUtah Supreme Court · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API