Legal Opinion

Heywood v. Ogden Motor Car Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1928No. 4493PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHansen, J.

This action arose out of a written lease whereby the plaintiffs leased to the defendant certain premises located in Ogden City, Utah. The plaintiffs’ complaint sets out five causes of action. The first cause of action is for the recovery of rent alleged to be due and owing under the terms of the lease. The second cause of action is for damages alleged to have been done by the lessee to the roof of the building located upon the leased premises. The third cause of action is for money paid by the lessors for electric power furnished to light the leased premises. The fourth cause of action is for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hines v. WillcoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Welz v. RhodiusIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Lewis v. . SeaburyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Firman v. BatemanUtah Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Parker v. Weber County Irr. Dist.Utah Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Richard Barton Enterprises, Inc. v. TsernUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Sandall v. HoskinsUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Harrison v. . CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. Wasatch Livestock Loan Co. v. Lewis & SharpUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Workman Motor Co. v. Pacific Finance Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API