Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 27, 2007PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Senior Judge KELLEY.
Mark A. Jackson (Claimant), pro se, petitions for review from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board), which affirmed an order of an unemployment compensation referee (referee) denying Claimant benefits under the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law). 1 We affirm.
Claimant worked for Rohm and Haas Company (Employer) from January 1992 until August 2000. Claimant stopped working due to health-related reasons and received benefits through Employer’s long-term disability plan. On April 16, 2006, Claimant filed an application for unemployment…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- House v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Leon E. Wintermyer, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Vista International Hotel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Daniels)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Fotta v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- City of McKeesport v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Miletti)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Henderson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Pagliei v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Devine V. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Bennett v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Wright v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.