Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Hiniker
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 6, 1978No. 47649PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of the Hennepin County District Court granting respondents’ motion for summary judgment and denying appellants’ motions for summary judgment, a preliminary injunction, and certification of a class action. We reverse.
The seven appellants are recipients of Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) benefits, who brought an action seeking a declaratory judgment and an injunction to prohibit the Department of Public Welfare (DPW) and the Hennepin County Welfare Board from treating certain rent credit refunds as income received by appellants in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Eunice B. LOCKE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Johnson v. MathewsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Caldwell v. CraigheadCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- Steere v. State, Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Wacha v. Kandiyohi County Welfare BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Deloitte & Touche LLP v. Fourteenth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Nagaraja v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Resident v. NootSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Ex Parte JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- In re the Welfare of the Children of K.S.F.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.