Legal Opinion

In re the Welfare of the Children of K.S.F.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 15, 2012No. A12-0631PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LARKIN, Judge.

Appellant-mother challenges the district court’s termination of her parental rights, arguing that (1) the standard of proof in a termination-of-parental-rights proceeding is clear-and-convincing evidence, (2) the record does not clearly and convincingly support the statutory determinations necessary to terminate her parental rights, (3) the evidence does not clearly and convincingly establish that termination is in her children’s best interests, and (4) the district court erred by refusing to transfer legal and physical custody of the children to appellant’s mother as an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re the Welfare of the Children of T.R.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  2. Matter of Welfare of RosenbloomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. In Re the Welfare of the Children of R.W.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  4. In Re the Welfare of the Children of S.E.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  5. In Re the Welfare of R.T.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re the Welfare of the Children of M.A.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  2. In re G. J. Parents F.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
  3. In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B. D. M. and A. T. C. W. (deceased), AKA A. T. W., AKA A. C. W., Parents. ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  4. In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. M. A. and M. R. H., Parents.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  5. In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: L. R. and J. B., Parents.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API