Legal Opinion
Farquhar & Co. v. Dehaven
West Virginia Supreme Court
Decided April 2, 1912PublishedCited by 19 opinions
Error to Circuit Court, Berkeley County. Action by Arthur B. Farquhar and others, partners, etc., against Charles E. Dehaven and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Judge:
The judgment below to which this writ of error applies, denied the motion of defendants to quash the execution on a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, entered against them, in vacation, by the clerk of the circuit court ou September 12, 1910.
The entire record of the judgment as presented here is as follows :
“This day came the defendants, by Martin & Seibert, their attorneys in fact, and say that they cannot gainsay the plaintiff’s action against them, but that they are justly indebted to the said plaintiffs in the sum of $527.07 with interest thereon from this date and the costs…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- First National Bank v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Hamilton v. SchoenbergerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
- Hunter's Ex'rs v. StewartWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
- Manson & Shell v. Rawlings' ExecutorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1911
- Saunders v. LipscombSupreme Court of Virginia · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Perkins v. HallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1941
- GAVENDA BROTHERS, INC v. Elkins Limestone CompanyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
- Dennison v. JackWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
- Chippewa Valley Securities Co. v. HerbstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Manypenny v. GrahamWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.