Legal Opinion

Halbach v. Halbach

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1951PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Respondents submit that the motion to vacate the judgment is insufficient because there is no affidavit that the appellant has a meritorious defense. Where, as here, the motion is made on the ground that the court lacked jurisdiction to enter the judgment, no affidavit of meritorious defense need be made. Chippewa Valley Securities Co. v. Herbst (1938), 227 Wis. 422, 428, 278 N. W. 872. They also submit that appellant’s long delay in proceeding to vacate the judgment constituted laches by reason of which he may be denied relief. Laches cannot operate to validate a void judgment and a judgment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chippewa Valley Securities Co. v. HerbstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Estate of Onstad v. OnstadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Neylan v. VorwaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Kohler Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Halverson v. HagemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  4. Estate of MolayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Neylan v. VorwaldCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API