In re Drucker

Respondent was admitted to practice by the Second Department in 1989. He resides in Plattsburgh, Clinton County.

Petitioner moves to suspend respondent from practice pending his full compliance with a subpoena duces tecum which directed him to appear before petitioner and produce and give testimony regarding three client files (see, 22 NYCRR 806.4 [b], [e]). Respondent appeared but did not produce the files. He has not replied to petitioner’s motion, which was personally served upon him.

Under such circumstances, we exercise our discretion and grant the motion, the suspension to be effective in…