Legal Opinion
Tuckel v. Argraves
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 2, 1961PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.
The substitute complaint in effect alleged: The plaintiff was walking on a sidewalk in East Hartford, within the limits of a trunk-line highway, when a directional sign fell on him. The sign, indicating “Boston” and “Springfield,” was maintained within the highway limits by the defendant as highway commissioner. It fell because of its defective condition, which was the result of neglect by tbe defendant in its maintenance. When the plaintiff was struck by the sign, he received injuries for which he seeks to recover damages.
A demurrer filed by the defendant was sustained on each of three…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bartram v. Town of SharonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Perrotti v. BennettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- McManus v. JarvisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Sedita v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Cook v. LawlorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Sanzone v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Bouchard v. People's BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Baker v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Murphy v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.