Legal Opinion
The Florida Bar v. Wasserman
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided March 21, 1996No. 83818, 84438 and 84814PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
675 So.2d 103 (1996)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,
v.
Phillip R. WASSERMAN, Respondent.
Nos. 83818, 84438 and 84814.
Supreme Court of Florida.
March 21, 1996.
Rehearing Denied May 15, 1996.
John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and John T. Berry, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and Stephen C. Whalen, Assistant Staff Counsel, Tampa, for Complainant.
Scott K. Tozian of Smith and Tozian, Tampa, for Respondent.
2Per curiam
We have for review three consolidated complaints of The Florida Bar and the referee's report regarding alleged ethical breaches by Phillip R. Wasserman. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla.…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. PearceSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- The Florida Bar v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Florida BarSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- The Florida Bar v. Van StillmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- 5-H CORP. v. PadovanoSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- The Florida Bar v. RatinerSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
- The Florida Bar v. MartocciSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- The Florida Bar v. AbramsonSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
- Florida Bar v. MorganSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.