Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Van Stillman

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 1, 1992No. 76066PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

606 So.2d 360 (1992)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,

v.

L. VAN STILLMAN, Respondent.

No. 76066.

Supreme Court of Florida.

October 1, 1992.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and John T. Berry, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and David M. Barnovitz, Bar Counsel, Fort Lauderdale, for complainant.

John A. Weiss, Tallahassee, for respondent.

2Per curiam

This cause is before the Court on complaint of The Florida Bar for consideration of the referee's findings and recommendation that attorney L. Van Stillman be disciplined for ethical violations. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

The referee entered…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. SiegelSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. The Florida Bar v. NuckollsSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. The Florida Bar v. BenekeSupreme Court of Florida · 1985

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. The Florida Bar v. WassermanSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  3. People v. JacksonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. Florida Bar v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  5. The Florida Bar v. Jonathan Stephen SchwartzSupreme Court of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API