The Florida Bar v. Abramson
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
We have for review a referee’s report recommending that William Abramson be found guilty of professional misconduct and publicly reprimanded. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. We *965approve the findings of fact and recommendations of guilt in the referee’s report but disapprove the recommendation of sanction. Instead, we hold that the appropriate sanction in this case is a suspension of ninety-one days, requiring Abramson to demonstrate rehabilitation, including a demonstration that he is cognizant of and suitably remorseful for his misconduct pri- or to being reinstated as a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Florida Bar v. WalkdenSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- The Florida Bar v. MartocciSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Florida Bar v. MorganSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Florida Bar v. NorkinSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- The Florida Bar v. Kelsay Dayon PattersonSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
- Advisory Opinion to the Governor Re Commission of Elected JudgeSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
- In re Code for Resolving Professionalism ComplaintsSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- In Re AMENDMENTS TO the CODE FOR RESOLVING PROFESSIONALISM COMPLAINTSSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.