Legal Opinion

United States v. Jackson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 16, 1982No. 81-1094PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a government appeal pursuant to D.C.Code 1981, § 23-104(a)(l) following a pretrial suppression hearing in which the trial court suppressed the photographic identification testimony of one witness and further ruled that it would give a Bundy “missing witness” instruction concerning the showing of photo arrays to two government witnesses. See United States v. Bundy, 153 U.S.App.D.C. 191, 194, 472 F.2d 1266, 1269 (1972) (Leventhal J., concurring). We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in suppressing this photographic identification testimony, and we further…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Palermo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. United States v. AugenblickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United States v. Carlton E. Bryant, United States of America v. William E. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. DumlaoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  2. Groves v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Hill v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Battocchi v. Washington Hospital CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. United States v. MarshUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API