Legal Opinion
Display Technologies, Inc. v. Paul Flum Ideas, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 9, 1999No. 98 Civ. 5942 (RWS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Paul Flum Ideas, Inc. (“Flum”) has moved: (1) pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil procedure for partial summary judgment of invalidity of Claim 1 of United States Patent No. 5,646,176 (the “ 176 Patent”); and (2) pursuant to Rule 56 for summary judgment of noninfringement of the 176 Patent. For the reasons set forth below, Flum’s motion for summary judgment with respect to invalidity of Claim 1 is granted. Flum’s motion for summary judgment with respect to noninfringement is granted in part and denied in part.
The Paiiies
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Display Technologies, Inc. v. Paul Flum Ideas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Elite Licensing, Inc. v. Thomas Plastics, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Minerals Technologies Inc. v. OMYA AGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- American Stock Exchange, LLC v. Mopex, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003