Legal Opinion
Display Technologies, Inc. v. Paul Flum Ideas, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 4, 2002No. 01-1069PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
SCHALL, Circuit Judge.
Display Technologies, Inc. (“Display”) sued Paul Flum Ideas, Inc. (“Flum”) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for infringement of United States Patent No. 5,646,176 (the 176 patent), which is assigned to Display. In its suit against Flum, Display asserted claims 1-4, 7-11, 14-17, and 21-26 of that patent.
In two separate decisions, the district court granted summary judgment of invalidity and noninfringement in favor of Flum. In its first decision, in December of 1999, the court ruled that claim 1 of the 176 patent was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Johnson Worldwide Associates, Inc. v. Zebco Corporation and Brunswick CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Midwest Industries, Inc. v. Karavan Trailers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Interactive Gift Express, Inc. v. Compuserve Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Cable Electric Products, Inc. v. Genmark, Inc., A/K/A Diablo Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Richard Ruiz and Foundation Anchoring Systems, Inc. v. A.B. Chance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Scanner Technologies Corp. v. Icos Vision Systems Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Teleflex Inc. v. KSR International Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- Sony Electronics, Inc. v. Soundview Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
- Veritas Operating Corp. v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.