Legal Opinion
Minerals Technologies Inc. v. OMYA AG
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 7, 2004No. 04 Civ. 4484(VM)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Minerals Technologies Inc. (“MTI”) and Specialty Minerals Inc. (“SMI”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) have moved the Court for a preliminary injunction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 65 enjoining Defendants Omya AG, Omya Industries, Inc., and Omya, Inc. (collectively, “Omya”) from infringing or inducing infringement of Claim 1 of United States Patent No. 5,043,017, attached as Exhibit 1 to Declaration of Anthony J. Constantini dated August 27, 2004 (the “ ’017 Patent”). 1 For the reasons described below, Plaintiffs’ motion is denied.
I. FACTUAL…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- amazon.com, Inc. v. barnesandnoble.com, Inc. And barnesandnoble.com, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Manville Sales Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Paramount Systems, Inc., Robert S. Butterworth and Anthony J. DisimoneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Novo Nordisk of North America, Inc., Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Novo Nordisk, A/s v. Genentech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Display Technologies, Inc. v. Paul Flum Ideas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Minerals Technologies, Inc. v. OMYA AGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Minerals Technologies Inc. v. OMYA AGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006